img-0021

The biggest video games of 2022: Starfield, Elden Ring, Gran Turismo 7 and more

The Power of Radio Propaganda in Rwanda: Examining its Impact

Radio propaganda played a crucial role in the tragic events that took place in Rwanda in the 1990s. During this time, extremist radio stations broadcasted hateful messages that fueled ethnic tensions and ultimately led to the Rwandan Genocide. This article will examine the effect of radio propaganda in Rwanda and its impact on the country’s history. Radio was the primary source of information for the majority of Rwandans, especially in rural areas where access to other forms of media was limited. Radio-Télévision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM) was a radio station in Rwanda that played a significant role in the Rwandan Genocide of 1994. The government-controlled radio station, Radio Rwanda, and extremist extremist radio stations like RTLM, used this medium to spread their messages to a large audience. RTLM, in particular, played a key role in the genocide by promoting hate speech against the Tutsi ethnic group and encouraging violence against them. This radio station was a key tool used by extremist Hutu factions to spread hate speech against the Tutsi ethnic group, inciting violence and perpetrating genocide. The messages broadcasted on RTLM had a profound impact on the population and contributed to the mobilization of large numbers of people to participate in the violence. The Tutsi and Hutu are two ethnic groups in Rwanda and neighboring countries in East Africa. Historically, the Tutsi and Hutu were differentiated by economic and political power rather than by any distinct cultural or physical differences. The Tutsi were traditionally seen as the elite class and held political and economic power, while the Hutu were seen as the lower class. The messages broadcasted on RTLM and other extremist radio stations had a profound impact on the population. They incited fear and hatred among the masses, leading to the perpetration of horrific crimes against the Tutsi people. The radio propaganda was so effective that it was able to mobilize large numbers of people to participate in the genocide. This is a stark reminder of the power of media in shaping public opinion and driving societal change. In conclusion, the effect of radio propaganda in Rwanda cannot be overstated. The use of this medium to spread hateful messages fueled ethnic tensions and ultimately led to the Rwandan Genocide. This tragedy serves as a cautionary tale about the potential dangers of media manipulation and the importance of responsible journalism. It is crucial that media outlets use their power to promote peace, unity, and understanding, rather than spreading hate and division. *** The Rwandan Genocide ended in July 1994 with the military victory of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a Tutsi-led rebel group, over the Hutu-dominated government forces. The RPF established a new government, which has since worked to promote reconciliation between the Tutsi and Hutu communities. However, the aftermath of the genocide was marked by large-scale violence and displacement, as hundreds of thousands of Hutu fled to neighboring countries, fearing retaliation from the Tutsi-led government. Many of these refugees lived in camps for years, and some were involved in cross-border attacks against Rwanda. In the years since the genocide, Rwanda has made significant progress in its recovery and development. The government has implemented a number of programs aimed at promoting reconciliation and healing, including traditional justice mechanisms such as Gacaca courts and community-based reconciliation initiatives. Today, Rwanda is widely recognized as a success story of post-conflict recovery and reconciliation. Despite the ongoing challenges it faces, the country has made significant progress in areas such as economic growth, improved health and education outcomes, and reduced poverty levels.
>>Read more
Liability and safety tips for dog owners

Most dogs are friendly, loving members of the family, but even normally docile dogs may bite when they are frightened or when protecting their puppies, owners or food. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 4.7 million people are bitten by dogs annually, resulting in an estimated 800,000 injuries that require medical attention. More than 50 percent of dog bites occur on the dog owner’s property, and they account for one-third of all homeowners insurance liability claims. Dog owner liability Dog owners are liable for any injuries their pets cause in the following instances: if the owner knew the dog had a tendency to cause that kind of injury; if a state statute makes the owner liable, whether or not the owner knew the dog had a tendency to cause that kind of injury; or if the injury was caused by unreasonable carelessness on the part of the owner. There are three kinds of law that impose liability on owners: Dog-bite statute – The dog owner is automatically liable for any injury or property damage the dog causes, even without provocation. “One-bite” rule – In some states, the owner is not held liable for the first bite the dog inflicts. Once an animal has demonstrated vicious behavior, such as biting or otherwise displaying a “vicious propensity”, the owner can be held liable. Some states have moved away from the one-bite rule and hold owners responsible for any injury, regardless of whether the animal has previously bitten someone. Negligence laws – The dog owner is liable if the injury occurred because the dog owner was unreasonably careless (negligent) in controlling the dog. In most states, dog owners are not liable to trespassers who are injured by a dog. However, a dog owner who is legally responsible for an injury to a person or property may be also responsible for reimbursing the injured person for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering and property damage. Protect yourself—and your assets Homeowners and renters insurance policies typically cover dog bite liability. Most policies provide $100,000 to $300,000 in liability coverage. If the claim exceeds the limit, the dog owner is personally responsible for all damages above that amount, including legal expenses. Most insurance companies will insure homeowners with dogs. However, once a dog has bitten someone, it poses an increased risk. In such a case, the insurance company may charge a higher premium or exclude the dog from coverage altogether. Some companies will require dog owners to sign liability waivers for dog bites. Some will cover a pet if the owner takes the dog to classes aimed at modifying its behavior. A single lawsuit—even if won—can end up costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. And the greater a person’s assets, the more potentially is at risk. The personal liability coverage available through a standard homeowners or automobile policy simply may not be enough, so you may want to consider purchasing a personal excess liability policy. Also known as an umbrella liability policy, it protects you against personal liabilities—such as dog bites—that could impact a substantial portion of your assets. The amount of umbrella liability coverage usually ranges from $1 million to $10 million, and covers broad types of liability. Most insurance companies have required minimum amounts of underlying coverage—typically at least $250,000 of protection from your auto policy and $300,000 of protection from your homeowners policy. If you own a boat, then you must also have boat insurance with a specified minimum amount of coverage. Personal excess liability insurance is relatively inexpensive. The first $1 million of coverage costs about $150 to $300 per year, the second million about $75, and subsequent increments of $1 million cost about $50 per year. Be a responsible dog owner Ultimately, the responsibility for properly training and controlling a dog rests with the owner. The most dangerous dogs are those that fall victims to human shortcomings such as poor training, irresponsible ownership and breeding practices that foster viciousness or neglect and abuse. To reduce the chances of a dog biting, the following steps are recommended by the CDC when getting a dog: Consult with a professional (e.g., veterinarian, animal behaviorist, or responsible breeder) to learn about suitable breeds of dogs for your household and neighborhood. Spend time with a dog before buying or adopting it. Use caution when bringing a dog into a home of with an infant or toddler. Dogs with histories of aggression are inappropriate in households with children. Be sensitive to cues that a child is fearful or apprehensive about a dog and, if so, delay acquiring a dog. Never leave infants or young children alone with any dog. Have your dog spayed or neutered. Studies show that dogs are three times more likely to bite if they are NOT neutered. Socialize your dog so that it knows how to act with other people and animals. Discourage children from disturbing a dog that is eating or sleeping. Play non-aggressive games with your dog, such as “go fetch.” Playing aggressive games like “tug-of-war” can encourage inappropriate behavior. Avoid exposing your dog to new situations in which you are unsure of its response. Never approach a strange dog and always avoid eye contact with a dog that appears threatening. Immediately seek professional advice from veterinarians, animal behaviorists, or responsible breeders if the dog develops aggressive or undesirable behaviors.
>>Read more
Elon Musk denies sexual misconduct allegations

The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, has denied claims that he groped and exposed himself to an employee at his SpaceX rocket company six years ago. A report in the Business Insider news outlet on Thursday alleged SpaceX paid the ex-flight attendant $250,000 (£200,000) to settle the claim. “Those wild accusations are utterly untrue,” he wrote on Twitter. Mr. Musk told Business Insider its article was a “politically motivated hit piece”. The SpaceX founder suggested the piece was intended to interfere with his stalled $44bn (£35bn) acquisition of Twitter and malign the recent shift in his politics. He had used the social media site to announce he “can no longer support” the Democratic Party on Wednesday, saying he plans to vote for Republicans in future elections. Shares in his electric car company, Tesla, dropped on Friday. According to Business Insider, SpaceX paid the unnamed woman a severance agreement that was settled out of court and, as part of the deal, she was not allowed to sue the company or talk about the alleged incident. The magazine quotes an anonymous friend of the flight attendant, who it claimed had provided a signed declaration as part of the settlement process. The friend said Mr. Musk had exposed himself to the former employee – a cabin crew member on contract for SpaceX’s corporate jet fleet – in 2016 while receiving a massage from her aboard his private jet. He is said to have exposed his genitals to her, touched her leg without consent, and offered to buy her a gift if she would “do more” – referring to the performance of sex acts. The BBC has not been able to confirm these reports independently. In a series of tweets late on Thursday night, he alleged the friend quoted in the report was “a far-left activist/actress in [Los Angeles] with a major political ax to grind” – and challenged her to verify the claims by describing his intimate body parts. Nicholas Carlson, the magazine’s editor-in-chief, defended his outlet’s work, writing on Twitter: “We stand by our story, which is based on documents and interviews and speaks for itself.” Read more at bbc.com
>>Read more
How can I save on long-term care insurance?

The tips below will help you save money wisely, but don’t rely on price alone. Key factors in choosing a policy Company financial stability – Because you may not collect for decades to come, be sure to buy from a company that has been around for some time and is financially stable. You may want to look up, from an independent rating agency, the financial strength ratings of a company you’re considering. Percentage of income – Keep the premium for your long-term care insurance policy to 7 percent of your income, or less. For example, if your monthly income is $4,000, the long-term care insurance premium should not be more than $280 per month. (This is what the National Association of Insurance Commissioners recommends in its Model Regulation for Long-Term Care Insurance.) Another expert advises that the income to use in this calculation isn’t your current income, but your expected income in retirement since that’s the income from which you’ll be paying premiums for most of the policy’s existence. Other ways of saving Find out if long-term care benefits are available through a group policy from your employer. Employers might subsidize the cost, lowering what you must pay. Check whether you can add long-term care benefits as a rider on an existing life insurance or annuity policy. These “combination” arrangements can save because the insurance company gains operational savings that it can pass along to you. Buy a policy with the longest waiting period you can afford. For example, choosing a 90-day period instead of a 30-day period can cut the premium by 30%. However, if you do need long-term care services, you should save some money to pay these costs until the waiting period ends. If both spouses of a married couple are considering buying long-term care policies, look into buying one joint policy for both of you. Such a policy pays when either one needs care and can pay for both, if necessary, up to its benefit limits. If you’re still looking to trim the premium further, consider buying a policy that will pay most, but not all, of the average nursing home costs in your area. For example, if a nursing home room now costs $120 per day, buy a policy that pays $100 per day. However, be sure to buy an inflation-protection provision. Check with several companies and agents, comparing both benefits and costs. As with other types of insurance (and many other purchases), comparison shopping can save you money. Just be sure you’re comparing policies with similar provisions and companies with comparable financial strength and service records.
>>Read more
What is ‘Partnership for Long-Term Care’ programs?

Medicaid is a state-government-administered program that pays the medical and long-term care expenses of poor people. If you have more money than your state permits when you need long-term care services, your state’s Medicaid won’t pay for those services. You’ll have to spend your own money–including using up your assets–until you become poor enough to qualify. But if you live in California, Connecticut, Indiana or New York and you participate in the state’s Partnership for Long-Term Care program, you can qualify for Medicaid without spending yourself into poverty. To participate in the Partnership, you must buy a long-term care insurance policy that contains at least the basic benefits required by the Partnership program. What’s the benefit of participating in the Partnership? If you live in California, Connecticut, or Indiana, for example, and you buy a policy under the program, live in the state while receiving long-term care services, and receive and exhaust the benefits under the policy for long-term care services, you can apply for Medicaid benefits even though you haven’t sold and used your assets. Each dollar paid by the insurance company is a dollar of assets you can keep in addition to the minimums permitted by your state’s Medicaid rules. For example, suppose the long-term care policy has paid $50,000 in benefits; in that case, you can keep $50,000 in investments or savings and still qualify for Medicaid. Without a Partnership long-term care policy, you’d probably have to spend virtually all of that $50,000 (this is called spending down) before you became eligible for Medicaid to pay your long-term care bills. However, even under the Partnership program, although you get to keep your assets, you might still have to use part of your income to pay long-term care expenses. Connecticut and Indiana have a reciprocity agreement so that if you buy a policy under one state’s Partnership program and move to the other state, you can obtain the benefits of the other state’s partnership program. Each state’s program is different, so be sure to learn the details of your state’s Partnership program before buying a long-term care policy. In California, for example, the basic benefits include the following: Interchangeable benefits can be switched between nursing home care and home care, or a combination of the two. A deductible that must be met only once in your lifetime. Inflation protection ensures that benefits keep pace with the rising cost of care. Waiver of premiums while you are receiving benefits in a nursing home or residential care facility. Care coordination to assist you in planning and obtaining the services you want and need. Under the California Partnership program, two types of policies are available–one that covers only benefits delivered in a nursing home or residential care facility, and one that covers comprehensively (at home, in a community facility, in a residential care facility, or in a nursing home).
>>Read more